GAKASVI.

Finance ยท Tax ยท Compliance ยท Automation

We find what your finance function is losing. Then we fix it.

End-to-end finance transformation for large corporates โ€” from process audit to full automation. Every mandate ends with a function that is tighter, tax-efficient and structurally sound.

The mandate runs in five stages

  1. UnderstandDeep-dive into existing processes, systems and controls.
  2. IdentifySurface the gaps, leakages and inefficiencies you are missing.
  3. RedesignRebuild processes โ€” tax-efficient, compliant, scalable.
  4. AutomateStandardise and automate accounting workflows end to end.
  5. OptimiseSustain performance after we hand the function back.

Sector depth across

Most finance functions are built to report the past. We build them to protect the future.

We don't audit for the sake of auditing. Every engagement ends with a finance function your board can rely on โ€” and a number attached to what it recovered.

โ‚น0Cr+Recovered in tax leakages across mandates
0%Compliance track record across all clients
0+Finance processes automated across industries
0+Years of advisory experience in Indian corporates
Inside a live mandate

The same discipline a global finance team applies to its own numbers, applied to yours.

Full-population testing, documented process ownership, and a redesign your team can run without us in the room โ€” the working method behind every engagement, on every mandate.

Your finance function has gaps. We close them.

Schedule a confidential consultation with our advisory team. No cost, no commitment, and an NDA before anything sensitive is shared.

Home / Services

What we do

Five disciplines that can be bought separately and are worth far more together. Each one carries a defined scope, a fixed deliverable set, and a measurable outcome.

Fixed scope, fixed fee

Every discipline below has a defined deliverable set before work starts.

How the disciplines fit together

Most clients start with the audit because it prices everything that follows. Nothing else is sold until the gap is proven.

If your problem isStart hereTypical durationWhat you get
"We don't know where money is leaking"Process audit & gap analysis4โ€“8 weeksQuantified gap register, prioritised by value
"Our tax position worries the board"Tax efficiency & compliance6โ€“12 weeksRecovery plan, exposure map, compliance calendar
"Month-end takes too long"Accounting automation8โ€“16 weeksStandardised close, automated schedules, shorter cycle
"Too many people, too much email"Business process automation12โ€“24 weeksAutomated workflows with approvals and audit trail
"The function can't support our growth"Finance function design12โ€“20 weeksTarget operating model and an implementation roadmap

Not sure which one you need?

A 45-minute diagnostic call is usually enough for us to tell you where the value sits โ€” and whether you need us at all.

Home / Services / Process audit

Finance process audit & gap analysis

We map your entire finance function, identify every gap, and quantify the cost of each. You end up with a register of findings ranked by rupee value, not a slide deck of observations.

What we examine

  • Procure-to-pay: requisition, PO discipline, GRN matching, vendor master hygiene
  • Order-to-cash: billing accuracy, credit control, collections, disputes and write-offs
  • Record-to-report: close calendar, journal controls, reconciliations, consolidation
  • Tax operations: return preparation, credit matching, TDS, assessments and litigation trail
  • Controls: delegation of authority, segregation of duties, system access, override history
  • Systems: ERP configuration, interfaces, spreadsheets that carry production processes

What you receive

  • Process maps for every in-scope cycle, as it actually runs
  • A gap register with severity, root cause, owner and annual rupee impact
  • Quantified leakage: recoverable now, preventable going forward
  • A prioritised remediation roadmap with effort and sequencing
  • A board-ready summary written for people who don't work in finance

Typical duration 4โ€“8 weeks depending on entity count and ERP landscape.

How the audit runs

Weeks 1โ€“2

Access and mapping

Data extraction, system walkthroughs, and interviews with process owners at working level.

Weeks 3โ€“5

Testing and quantification

Transaction-level testing on full populations where data allows, not judgemental samples.

Weeks 6โ€“8

Findings and roadmap

Validation with your team, then a final register and roadmap presented to the CFO and audit committee.

Find out what the gap is worth.

We scope the audit against your entity count, ERP and transaction volume, and give you a fixed fee before we start.

Home / Services / Tax efficiency & compliance

Tax efficiency & compliance

Recover leakages, reduce exposure, and build a tax structure that holds up to scrutiny. Efficiency that cannot be defended in an assessment is not efficiency.

Indirect tax

  • Input tax credit review: unclaimed, blocked, reversed and mismatched credit
  • Reconciliation of returns to books to vendor filings, at invoice level
  • Classification, valuation and place-of-supply positions
  • Refunds: exports, inverted duty structure, and accumulated credit
  • Notice and assessment readiness โ€” documentation before it is asked for

Direct tax and withholding

  • Withholding tax review across vendor and payroll populations
  • Allowability of expenditure, and the evidence file behind each position
  • Group structure, related-party pricing and intercompany documentation
  • Advance tax and provision accuracy against the closing position
  • Litigation register with a defensible view on each open matter

The compliance spine

Recovery is one-time. The calendar is what keeps the record at 100%.

A single calendar

Every filing, entity, registration and due date in one owned, monitored calendar with escalation.

Maker, checker, approver

Named responsibility at each step, with system-enforced review before anything is filed.

Evidence at source

Supporting documentation captured when the transaction happens, not reconstructed years later.

โ‚น500Cr+ recovered so far.

Most of it was sitting in credit registers, vendor mismatches and refunds nobody owned. We start by looking at yours.

Home / Services / Accounting automation

Accounting automation & standardisation

Eliminate manual processes. Standardise your books. Reduce error rates and close cycle time โ€” without a two-year systems programme.

Standardise first

Automation applied to an inconsistent process multiplies the inconsistency. We standardise before we automate.

  • One chart of accounts across entities, with a documented mapping
  • One accounting manual: policies written as instructions, not principles
  • One close calendar, with dependencies and owners named
  • Standard journal templates with embedded validation

Then automate

  • Bank, vendor, customer and intercompany reconciliations
  • Accruals, prepayments, depreciation and recurring journals
  • Invoice capture and three-way matching
  • Consolidation, eliminations and reporting pack generation
  • Exception reporting so people review breaks, not everything

What usually changes

โˆ’60%Typical reduction in close cycle days
โˆ’75%Manual journal entries after standardisation
200+Processes automated across client mandates
100%Reconciliations with a documented owner

Close the books in days, not weeks.

We work with the ERP you already own. Replacing it is a last resort, not a starting assumption.

Home / Services / Business process automation

Business process automation

Automate finance workflows across procurement, payables, receivables and reporting โ€” with approvals, controls and an audit trail built in from the first release.

Procure to pay

Requisition and PO workflow, vendor onboarding with tax validation, invoice capture, three-way match, exception routing and payment release controls.

Order to cash

Customer master control, billing automation, credit limits, dunning, collections workflow, dispute tracking and cash application.

Record to report

Close task management, automated reconciliations, journal approval routing, and a reporting pack that builds itself from the ledger.

Compliance operations

Return preparation workflows, document repositories tied to transactions, and automated alerts on filing dependencies.

How we build

Short releases against a signed process design. Nothing goes live without a control walkthrough and a rollback path.

Design

Process first, tool second

We agree the redesigned process and its controls before choosing what to build it on.

Build

Release in slices

Each release covers one workflow end to end, in production, with real users โ€” typically 3โ€“4 weeks.

Handover

Your team runs it

Documentation, admin training and a support taper. We are not trying to become permanent staff.

Take the manual work out of finance.

Tell us where your team spends its evenings. That is usually the right first workflow.

Home / Services / Finance function design

End-to-end finance function design

Build or rebuild your finance function from the ground up โ€” structured for scale, staffed correctly, and controlled well enough to survive growth, audit and diligence.

The operating model

  • What sits central, what sits in the business, what gets outsourced
  • Shared service design where transaction volume justifies it
  • Role definitions, spans of control and the hiring plan behind them
  • Delegation of authority matched to risk, not to seniority alone
  • A systems architecture that will still hold at three times the volume

The control environment

  • Risk and control matrix mapped to each process cycle
  • Segregation of duties enforced in the system, not on paper
  • Internal financial controls documentation and testing approach
  • Management reporting: one set of numbers, one definition per metric
  • Readiness for statutory audit, due diligence and lender scrutiny

When clients call us for this

Before a transaction

Diligence, listing or fundraising exposes everything. Better to find it before the buyer does.

After rapid growth

A function that worked at โ‚น200Cr revenue rarely works at โ‚น1,000Cr without redesign.

On a CFO transition

A new CFO needs an independent read of what they have inherited, fast.

Build the function your next five years need.

We design it, help you hire into it, and stay until it runs without us.

Home / Approach

A five-step mandate. No ambiguity.

Every engagement follows the same sequence. You know what happens each week, who is involved, and what lands at the end of each stage.

Understand โ†’ Identify โ†’ Redesign โ†’ Automate โ†’ Optimise

The same five stages, on every mandate, in the same order.

01

Understand

Deep-dive into your existing finance processes, systems and controls. Walkthroughs with the people who actually run them, and extraction of full transaction data.

Weeks 1โ€“2
02

Identify

Surface gaps, leakages and inefficiencies your current function misses โ€” each one quantified, attributed to a root cause, and validated with your team before it is reported.

Weeks 3โ€“5
03

Redesign

Rebuild processes with precision โ€” tax-efficient, compliant and scalable. Documented as instructions your team can follow without us in the room.

Weeks 6โ€“10
04

Automate

Standardise and automate accounting workflows end to end, released in slices, each one live in production with real users before the next begins.

Weeks 10โ€“24
05

Optimise

Continuous improvement to sustain a high-performance finance function โ€” with a defined support taper, not an open-ended retainer.

Ongoing

What we ask of you

Mandates fail for predictable reasons. These four commitments prevent most of them.

One executive sponsor

Usually the CFO. Someone with the authority to decide when a process changes and a team objects.

Read access to systems and data

We test full populations, not samples. That needs data extracts, not screenshots.

Named process owners

One person per cycle who can answer how it really runs, and who will own the redesign afterwards.

A fortnightly decision forum

Forty-five minutes, same attendees, decisions recorded. Programmes stall in the gaps between meetings.

How we engage

Three commercial structures. We will tell you which one fits before you ask.

ModelBest forFee basisCommitment
DiagnosticFirst engagements and board mandatesFixed fee4โ€“8 weeks
Transformation programmeRedesign and automation at scaleFixed fee by phase, with milestone gates3โ€“12 months
Advisory retainerSustaining the function after handoverMonthly, capped hoursRolling, 30-day exit

Recovery-linked fees are available on specific tax mandates where the baseline can be measured objectively. We will say so if we think it is the wrong structure for you.

No ambiguity, from the first meeting.

You will get a written scope, a fixed fee and a named team before anything starts.

Home / Industries

Industries

A gap analysis is only as good as the sector knowledge behind it. These are the industries where we know what to look for before we arrive.

Across six sectors

Different balance sheets. The same failure modes.

Manufacturing, retail, technology, infrastructure, pharma and financial services all lose value in different places โ€” but for the same handful of reasons.

Manufacturing & engineering

Job-work credit chains, plant-level procurement discipline, scrap and by-product accounting, cost centre design, and the input credit that goes missing between plant and head office.

Retail & consumer goods

Distributor schemes and credit notes, high-volume receivables reconciliation, returns accounting, and trade spend that is approved commercially but never tested financially.

Technology & business services

Export refunds and accumulated credit, cross-border billing and place of supply, revenue recognition on long contracts, and intercompany pricing documentation.

Infrastructure, EPC & real estate

Project-wise accounting, contractor and sub-contractor compliance, retention and WIP treatment, and revenue recognised across multi-year cycles.

Pharmaceutical & healthcare

Regulated documentation standards, distributor and institutional billing, expiry and returns, and control environments that must satisfy more than one regulator.

Banking & financial services

Reconciliation at volume, regulatory reporting accuracy, vendor and outsourcing controls, and evidence standards set by supervisory expectation.

Where we see leakage most often

Across sectors, the same handful of failures account for most of what we recover.

  • Input tax credit that lapses because vendor filings were never reconciled at invoice level
  • Duplicate and overpaid vendor invoices in the absence of enforced three-way matching
  • Contracted rates and rebates that are never applied to the invoices they govern
  • Withholding applied at the wrong rate across large, long-tail vendor populations
  • Refunds โ€” export, inverted duty, excess payment โ€” that nobody was made responsible for
  • Credit notes issued commercially but never reflected in the tax position
  • Reconciliations performed but never reviewed, with breaks aging quietly for years

We probably know your sector's failure modes.

Tell us the industry and the entity structure. We will tell you where we would look first.

Home / Results

Results

Client names are confidential by default. The numbers, the scope and the method are not โ€” and we will walk any prospective client through a full case under NDA.

โ‚น0Cr+Recovered in tax leakages across mandates
0%Compliance track record across all clients
0+Finance processes automated across industries
0+Years of advisory experience in Indian corporates
How we measure a mandate

Recovered. Protected. Released. Every number traceable to your own ledger.

We do not count avoided costs we cannot evidence โ€” the same standard we hold your finance function to.

Selected mandates

Manufacturing ยท multi-plant

Credit reconciliation across nine plants

Invoice-level reconciliation of returns to books to vendor filings across three years identified substantial lapsed and mismatched input credit. A monthly vendor-compliance process now prevents recurrence, and plant finance teams own it.

Consumer goods ยท national distribution

Trade spend and credit note control

Scheme accruals were being approved commercially without a financial control. We rebuilt the approval workflow, tied every credit note to a scheme and an invoice, and closed the gap between the commercial and tax positions.

Technology services ยท export-led

Refund cycle rebuilt

Accumulated credit had built up because no single role owned refund filing. A defined owner, a documented evidence pack and a filing calendar turned a dormant balance into a recurring cash inflow.

Infrastructure ยท project accounting

Close cycle cut from 18 days to 6

Standard chart of accounts across project entities, automated reconciliations and a dependency-mapped close calendar. Management reporting now lands before the board asks for it.

Pharmaceuticals ยท regulated

Payables automation with full audit trail

Invoice capture, three-way matching and exception routing replaced an email-based approval chain. Duplicate payments stopped, and the audit trail now satisfies both statutory and regulatory review.

Group holding ยท seven entities

Finance function redesigned pre-diligence

Target operating model, shared service design, control matrix and a hiring plan, delivered ahead of a fundraise. Diligence findings on finance processes: none material.

How we report value

Every number we claim is traceable to a transaction, a filing or a measured cycle time. We do not count avoided costs we cannot evidence.

Recovered

Cash or credit actually realised, agreed with your team and reconciled to your ledger.

Protected

Exposure removed, measured against the assessed or assessable position it would have created.

Released

Effort returned to your team, measured in cycle days and processed volume per person.

We will show you the full case.

Under NDA, with the working papers, for the mandate closest to your situation.

Home / About

Built for finance functions that carry real weight

Gakasvi is a finance transformation, tax efficiency and compliance advisory firm working with large corporates across India. Small team, senior people, no leverage pyramid.

Why we exist

Most finance functions are built to report the past. They close the books, file the returns and answer the auditor. What they rarely do is ask what the process itself is costing.

We started Gakasvi because that question was going unasked in companies large enough to lose serious money to it. In fifteen years of working inside Indian corporate finance functions, the pattern held: the leakage was never hidden, it was simply unowned.

So we built a firm around finding it and closing it โ€” audit, tax, automation and design in one mandate, because separating them is how the value escapes in the first place.

How we work

  • Senior people on the ground. The person who scopes your mandate runs it.
  • Fixed fees and written scope before work starts.
  • Full-population testing wherever the data allows it.
  • Findings validated with your team before they reach your board.
  • A defined end. We hand the function back and taper out.
  • Independence. We take no commission from any software vendor we recommend.
Advisory team reviewing findings together in a working session

Findings reviewed with the client team before they reach the board โ€” not after.

Fifteen years in

Senior people on the ground, not on the org chart.

The partner who scopes your mandate is the one who runs it โ€” through the audit, the redesign, and the automation build that follows.

Leadership

Founder

Arun โ€” Founder & Managing Partner

Fifteen years across finance transformation, indirect tax and controllership in Indian corporates. Has led gap analyses and recovery mandates across manufacturing, consumer, services and infrastructure, and personally leads scoping on every engagement.

Practice

Advisory & automation team

Chartered accountants, indirect tax specialists and process automation engineers working as one team. Every mandate is staffed with a tax lead and an automation lead from day one, because the redesign and the tax position have to be built together.

What we will not do

Being clear about this saves everyone time.

  • We do not take positions we could not defend in an assessment
  • We do not sell software licences or take vendor referral fees
  • We do not staff mandates with juniors and invoice for partners
  • We do not accept engagements where we cannot get access to underlying data
  • We do not extend retainers that are no longer producing measurable value

Meet the people who would run your mandate.

First conversations are with the partner who would lead the work, not a business development team.

Home / Insights

Insights

Notes from live mandates, written for CFOs and finance controllers. No commentary on legislation you have already read three versions of.

Get the quarterly note.

One email a quarter to finance leaders: what we are seeing across mandates, and what is worth acting on. No promotion.

Home / Insights / Input credit

The seven places input credit quietly disappears

Indirect tax ยท 12 min read

When a large corporate loses input credit, the loss almost never comes from one bad decision. It accumulates through small gaps in ownership โ€” points where a task belongs to procurement in practice, to accounts payable on the org chart, and to the tax team in consequence.

The leakage is not hidden. It is unowned.

1. Vendor filings that were never reconciled at invoice level

Summary-level reconciliation will tell you the totals roughly agree. It will not tell you which specific invoices your vendor failed to report, which is the only level at which you can act โ€” by withholding payment, by following up, or by writing the credit off deliberately rather than by default.

2. Credit blocked by documentation, not by law

Eligible credit gets reversed because the supporting document was incomplete at the time of review. The transaction was fine; the evidence was assembled months later by someone who wasn't there.

3. Job work and movement of goods

In manufacturing, credit chains break at plant boundaries. Goods move, documentation follows late, and the timing mismatch is resolved by reversing rather than investigating.

4. Credit notes issued commercially, not fiscally

A commercial team agrees a rebate. A credit note is issued. The tax treatment is applied to a different period, or not at all, and the position on both sides stops agreeing.

5. Refunds nobody owns

Export refunds and inverted duty accumulations sit as balances rather than as receivables. No role has the filing on their calendar, so the balance grows until someone treats it as a project.

6. Rate and classification applied inconsistently across entities

Group entities take different positions on the same transaction type, usually because each was decided locally at different times. Whichever position is wrong, one of them creates exposure and the other creates lost credit.

7. Reconciliation performed but never reviewed

The most expensive failure of all. A reconciliation is produced monthly, filed, and never read. Breaks age for years inside a control that technically exists.

What to do about it

  • Reconcile at invoice level, monthly, with a named owner and an escalation rule
  • Capture documentation at transaction time, tied to the transaction record
  • Put refund filings on the compliance calendar with an owner, like any return
  • Standardise classification positions across entities and document the reasoning
  • Review reconciliations. A control nobody reads is not a control

Read about our tax efficiency and compliance practice.

Find out what yours is losing.

A credit review usually pays for itself in the first month of findings.

Home / Insights / Controllership

Why your close takes eighteen days

Controllership ยท 9 min read

Ask a controller why the close takes as long as it does, and the answer is usually volume. Measure it, and the answer is almost always waiting.

Map the dependencies before you touch anything

Most close calendars are lists of tasks with dates. They are not dependency maps, so nobody can see which single late input is holding six downstream tasks. Until you can see that, every improvement effort is guesswork.

The three structural causes

  • Sequential work that could be parallel. Entities closing one after another because one team does all of them.
  • Reconciliations performed after the fact. Anything reconciled only at month-end turns the close into an investigation.
  • Review as a bottleneck. One person approving everything, in order, at the busiest time of the month.

What changes the number

Continuous reconciliation moves work out of the close window. Standard journal templates with validation remove the correction loop. Exception-based review means the reviewer looks at breaks rather than at everything. Automating the reporting pack removes two days that were never accounting work in the first place.

A six-day close in a multi-entity group is normal, not aspirational. Eighteen days means the work is being done at the wrong time, not that there is too much of it.

Read about accounting automation and standardisation.

Shorten the close.

We will map your dependencies in the first two weeks and tell you which three changes matter.

Home / Insights / Automation

What to automate before you replace the ERP

Automation ยท 8 min read

ERP replacement is the most expensive answer to questions that usually have cheaper ones. It is sometimes the right answer. It is rarely the first one.

Start with the work that happens outside the system

Look at where your team actually spends time: invoice capture, matching, reconciliation, follow-up email, and building the reporting pack. Almost none of that requires a new ERP. It requires workflow, validation and integration around the ERP you already own.

The order that works

  • Standardise the chart of accounts and the accounting manual first
  • Automate reconciliations, because they produce the data quality everything else depends on
  • Then payables: capture, matching and exception routing
  • Then receivables: billing, dunning and cash application
  • Then reporting, which is mostly assembly once the ledger is trustworthy

When replacement is genuinely the answer

When the system cannot enforce segregation of duties, cannot support your entity structure, or has been customised past the point where it can be upgraded safely. Those are architectural limits. Everything else is a process problem wearing a systems costume.

Read about business process automation.

Get more from the system you own.

We are vendor-independent and take no referral fees. If replacement is right, we will say so.

Home / Insights / Transactions

What diligence finds in the finance function

Transactions ยท 10 min read

Financial diligence is more predictable than most sellers expect. Buyers look at the same short list, and the findings that reduce valuation are usually the ones that could have been fixed in a quarter.

The nine things they test

  • Quality of earnings: what is recurring, and what was helped by timing
  • Revenue recognition policy and its consistency across periods
  • Working capital: the true normalised level, not the year-end snapshot
  • Provisions and their adequacy, especially litigation and receivables
  • Tax exposure: open assessments, positions taken, documentation behind them
  • Related-party transactions and their pricing basis
  • Off-balance-sheet commitments and contingent liabilities
  • Controls: segregation of duties, access, override history
  • Reconciliation status and the age of unresolved breaks

What you can fix before the process starts

Clear aged reconciliation breaks. Document your tax positions with the evidence that supports them. Rebuild the related-party file. Set provisions on a stated policy rather than judgement. None of this is difficult. It is simply work that never had a deadline until now.

The three you usually cannot fix late โ€” quality of earnings, revenue policy history and genuine working capital levels โ€” are the reason to start a year out rather than a month out.

Read about finance function design.

Be ready before the buyer arrives.

We run pre-diligence reviews that find what the other side will find, while you still have time to act.

Home / Insights / Controls

Controls that hold when volume triples

Controls ยท 7 min read

A control environment designed for today's volume is a control environment with an expiry date. The useful test is simple: if transaction volume tripled next quarter, which controls would survive?

Manual controls fail silently

A reviewer checking every invoice works at a thousand a month. At three thousand, the checking becomes cursory, and nothing in the process announces that it has stopped being a control. The documentation still says it happens. It still happens. It just no longer catches anything.

Three properties of a control that scales

  • System-enforced. The transaction cannot proceed if the condition is not met.
  • Exception-based. People review what broke, not what passed.
  • Evidenced automatically. The audit trail is a by-product, not a separate task.

Where to start

Take your risk and control matrix and mark every control that depends on a person looking at every item. That is your list, in order of transaction volume. Convert the top five, and you will have covered most of the risk that growth creates.

Read about control environment design.

Design controls for the volume you are heading to.

Not the one you have today.

Home / Contact

Talk to us

Tell us roughly what you are dealing with. A partner will respond within one working day, and we will sign an NDA before you share anything sensitive.

Send an enquiry

We use what you send only to respond to your enquiry. See our privacy policy.

Enquiry Sent Successfully

Thank you for reaching out. A partner will respond within one working day.

Corporate office towers, representative of the environment our clients operate in

Direct lines

What happens next

  • A partner responds within one working day
  • A 45-minute call to understand the situation โ€” no cost
  • NDA signed before any data is shared
  • A written scope and fixed fee, usually within a week

Home / Careers

Careers

We hire few people and give them real responsibility early. If you want to sit behind a partner for four years, this is the wrong firm.

Open roles

01

Manager โ€” Indirect tax & recovery

Lead credit reviews and reconciliation mandates at client sites. CA with 5โ€“8 years, strong on GST and comfortable working at transaction level in large data sets.

Noida ยท Full time
02

Consultant โ€” Finance transformation

Process mapping, gap quantification and redesign across procure-to-pay and record-to-report. CA or MBA with 3โ€“5 years in controllership or advisory.

Noida ยท Full time
03

Automation engineer โ€” Finance workflows

Build workflow, integration and reconciliation automation around client ERPs. Strong scripting, API integration, and the patience to work with accountants.

Noida / hybrid
04

Analyst โ€” Data & reconciliation

Full-population testing, reconciliation at scale, and analysis that turns findings into rupee numbers. 1โ€“3 years, high comfort with large data sets.

Noida ยท Full time

What it is like here

Client-facing from month one

You will present findings to controllers and CFOs early. We prepare you for it, then let you do it.

Small teams, whole problems

Three or four people on a mandate. You see the whole engagement, not one workstream of it.

Technical depth expected

We fund certifications and give study leave. We also expect you to know your subject cold.

To apply, send your CV and a short note on a finance process you have personally improved to arun.gakasvi@gmail.com, or use the contact form and select Careers.

Home / Confidentiality & data security

Confidentiality & data security

We work with your ledgers, contracts, tax filings and payroll. The handling standards below apply to every mandate and are written into every engagement letter.

NDA before data

A mutual non-disclosure agreement is signed before any client information is shared, including during the first scoping conversation.

Least-privilege access

Only named team members on the mandate receive access. Read-only wherever the work permits it. Access is revoked at engagement close, with a record of removal.

Client-controlled environments

Where you prefer it, we work entirely inside your systems and your data never leaves your environment. We have run full mandates this way.

Encryption in transit and at rest

Data exchange happens over encrypted channels through a secure repository. Ad-hoc email attachments of sensitive data are not used.

Device and endpoint controls

Firm-managed devices with full-disk encryption, screen lock, endpoint protection and no client data on removable media.

Defined retention

Working papers are retained only as long as professional and statutory requirements need. Client data is returned or destroyed on request, with written confirmation.

Independence and conflicts

  • We run a conflict check before accepting any mandate and will decline where a conflict exists
  • We accept no commission, referral fee or revenue share from software or service vendors
  • Every team member signs an individual confidentiality undertaking on joining
  • Sector insight is shared only in de-identified form, never with client-identifiable detail
  • We will not name you as a client, publicly or in a proposal, without your written consent

Your information security or procurement team is welcome to send us a vendor assessment questionnaire. We complete them as standard.

Procurement questions welcome.

Send your vendor onboarding pack, security questionnaire or DPA template and we will turn it around.

Home / Questions

Questions we are asked before every mandate

If yours is not here, ask it directly. We would rather answer it now than during a proposal.

How is this different from what our statutory or internal auditors do?
Auditors test whether what happened was recorded correctly. We test whether the process itself is costing you money, and then we change it. Our output is a redesigned function, not an opinion.
Will this disrupt our team during month-end?
We schedule interviews and testing around your close calendar and take data extracts rather than your controller's time. Most of the effort is ours.
How much of our team's time does a mandate need?
Roughly two to four hours per process owner during the first fortnight, then a fortnightly decision forum of forty-five minutes. Automation phases need more involvement from the process owners of the workflows being built.
Do you replace our ERP?
Only if its architecture genuinely cannot support your structure or controls. We take no vendor fees, so we have no incentive to recommend replacement.
Can fees be linked to recovery?
On specific tax recovery mandates where a baseline can be measured objectively, yes. For transformation work we use fixed fees by phase, because outcome-linked fees distort scope.
Who will actually do the work?
The partner who scopes your mandate runs it, with a tax lead and an automation lead named in the engagement letter. You will meet them before you sign.
What happens at the end?
Documentation, training and a defined support taper. If a retainer stops producing measurable value, we will tell you to end it.
Will you sign our NDA, DPA and vendor agreements?
Yes. We work to client paper routinely and complete security questionnaires as standard.
Do you work outside India?
We work with Indian corporates including their overseas subsidiaries, coordinating with local advisors where local filing expertise is required.
What size of company do you work with?
Our work pays for itself above roughly โ‚น250Cr of turnover or a comparable transaction volume. Below that, we will usually tell you so.

Ask the one we didn't answer.

Straight answers, no proposal attached.

Home / Privacy policy

Privacy policy

How Gakasvi handles personal information collected through this website and in the course of client engagements. Last updated September 2026.

What we collect

Through this website, we collect only what you submit through the enquiry form: your name, work email, company, phone number if you provide it, and the content of your message. We do not use advertising or tracking cookies on this site.

Why we collect it

To respond to your enquiry, to assess whether we can help, and to send you the quarterly insights note if you have asked for it. We do not sell or rent personal information, and we do not share it with third parties for their own marketing.

Client engagement data

Information received during an engagement, including any personal data within financial records, is processed only for the purposes set out in the engagement letter, under the confidentiality terms agreed there, and in line with the handling standards on our confidentiality and data security page.

How long we keep it

Enquiry correspondence is retained for as long as there is an active business relationship or prospect, and then deleted on request. Engagement working papers are retained for the period required by professional and statutory obligations.

Your rights

You may ask us what personal information we hold about you, ask for it to be corrected, ask for it to be deleted, or withdraw consent to receive the insights note at any time. Write to arun.gakasvi@gmail.com and we will respond within thirty days.

Security

We apply encryption in transit and at rest, least-privilege access, firm-managed encrypted devices and defined retention periods. No system is perfectly secure, and we will tell you promptly if a breach affects your information.

Contact

Gakasvi, A-426, Logix Technova, Sector-132, Noida 201304, India. Email arun.gakasvi@gmail.com, phone +91 8505804836.

Home / Terms of use

Terms of use

The terms on which this website is made available. Last updated September 2026.

Information, not advice

Everything on this site, including the insights articles, is general information about our services and about finance, tax and compliance practice. It is not professional advice and must not be relied on for any specific decision. Tax and regulatory positions depend entirely on facts and on law in force at the time. Take advice on your own circumstances before acting.

No engagement created

Using this site or submitting the enquiry form does not create a client relationship. An engagement begins only when we have completed conflict checks and both parties have signed an engagement letter.

Accuracy

We take care that the content here is accurate when published but do not warrant that it remains current. Statistics describing our work are aggregated across mandates and are not a representation about results in any individual case.

Intellectual property

The content, methodology descriptions, name and marks on this site belong to Gakasvi. You may read, quote with attribution, and share links. You may not republish substantial portions or present our material as your own.

Confidential information

Do not send confidential or sensitive information through the enquiry form. Share it only after a non-disclosure agreement is in place and through the secure channel we will provide.

Liability

To the extent permitted by law, we accept no liability for loss arising from use of, or reliance on, this website. Liability for our professional services is governed solely by the relevant engagement letter.

Governing law

These terms are governed by the laws of India, and the courts at Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh have exclusive jurisdiction.

Home / Page not found

That page isn't here

The link may be out of date. Start from the services overview, or tell us what you were looking for.